Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Lyles v. Hardy et al
as 4:2015cv00548
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lyles
Defendant:
Michael Hardy , Cherly Eoff and Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardie v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc.
as 5:2015cv05207
Plaintiff:
Andrew S. Hardie
Defendant:
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moore v. Eoff et al
as 4:2015cv00525
Plaintiff:
David Claude Moore , Jr
Defendant:
Randall Eoff, Cheryl Eoff, Mike Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steiner v. Progressive Corporation, The et al
as 5:2015cv05183
Plaintiff:
Daphna D. Steiner
Defendant:
Progressive Corporation, The, Glenn M. Renwick, John P. Sauerland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelley v. Hardy et al
as 4:2015cv00327
Plaintiff:
Alton Kelley
Defendant:
Mike Hardy and Cheryl Eoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Hardy et al
as 4:2015cv00229
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen Henderson
Defendant:
Alicia Hardy, Hayden, Cheryl Eoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruhl v. Boyd et al
as 4:2015cv00169
Plaintiff:
Ruth Ruhl
Defendant:
John T Boyd, Uniece Jackson, Kanisha Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
First National Bank of Izard County v. B & H Resources, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
First National Bank of Izard County
Defendant:
B & H Resources, LLC, Northstar Farms LLC, John P Hardy and others
Cross_claimant:
Celtic Bank
Cross_defendant:
Northstar Farms LLC, B & H Resources, LLC and Helen Bartmess
Counter_claimant:
Celtic Bank
Counter_defendant:
First National Bank of Izard County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hardy v. Mitchell
as 4:2014cv00288
Plaintiff:
Raymond D Hardy
Defendant:
Mary D Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
