Cases 21 - 30 of 42
William Robinson v. Gerard Williams, et al
as 14-13340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GERARD WILLIAMS, Esquire and KAREN WEISS
ROBINSON v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2013cv03131
Petitioner:
HENRY ROBINSON
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, DANIEL P. BURNS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF: LEHIGH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Williams et al
as 0:2013cv60344
Plaintiff:
William Henry Robinson
Defendant:
Gerard Williams and Karen Weiss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Mount Olive Correctional Center et al
as 2:2012cv00788
Plaintiff:
Gregg Dulaney Smith
Defendant:
Mount Olive Correctional Center, James Rubenstein, Samuel Keenan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Robinson v. USA
as 11-14801
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES HENRY ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. James Robinson
as 10-13791
Plaintiff - Appellee:
USA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES HENRY ROBINSON
Robinson v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 2:2009cv01654
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Inc. and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Inc., Employee Benefits Plan
Plaintiff:
Henry Robinson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Schreffler v. Prime Care Medical, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Adam Schreffler
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical, Inc., Sandra M. Ulerick, Tygart Valley Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jenkins v. North Central Regional Jail et al
as 5:2008cv00173
Plaintiff:
John H. Jenkins
Defendant:
North Central Regional Jail, Larcen, Reid and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
US v. Richard Robinson
as 08-5106
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD HENRY ROBINSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
