Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Johnson v. Shartle
as 4:2016cv00435
Petitioner: John Harvey Johnson
Respondent: JT Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. USA
as 4:2016cv00400
Petitioner: John Harvey Johnson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: John Johnson
as 16-20160
Movant: In re: JOHN HARVEY JOHNSON
Johnson v. Shartle
as 4:2015cv00580
Petitioner: John Harvey Johnson
Respondent: JT Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Christopher Torns v. Harvey Johnson, Jr., et al
as 15-60802
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER B. TORNS
Defendant - Appellee: HARVEY JOHNSON, JR., In his official capacity as Mayor for the City of Jackson and in his personal capacity and as Mayor emeritus for the City of Jackson, Mississippi, CITY OF JACKSON, CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Johnson v. Shartle
as 4:2015cv00073
Petitioner: John Harvey Johnson
Respondent: Unknown Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
John Johnson v. G. Palispis, et al
as 14-31413
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN HARVEY JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee: G. R. PALISPIS, OSCAR BERGENHOLTZ, R. SHALABI and others
In re: John Johnson
as 14-20706
Movant: In re: JOHN HARVEY JOHNSON
Johnson v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv04590
Plaintiff: Harvey Johnson
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. United States et al
as 3:2014cv00317
Plaintiff: HARVEY JOHNSON, and STATE OF TEXAS by and through HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION, DEPARTMENT OF ASSISTIVE AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES and Harvey Johnson
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney and Magdalena Jara
Defendant: UNITED STATES, by and through HONORABLE CHUCK HAGEL, Secretary of Defense, and HONORABLE JOHN McHUGH, Secretary of the Army
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 0107 Vending Facilities for Blind in Federal Buildings

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?