Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Joyce v. Hot Spring County Jail
as 4:2019cv00842
Defendant:
Hot Spring County Jail
Plaintiff:
Micheal Joyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutcheson v. Hot Spring County Jail
as 4:2019cv00841
Defendant:
Hot Spring County Jail
Plaintiff:
Christopher G Hutcheson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Hot Spring County Jail
as 4:2019cv00843
Defendant:
Hot Spring County Jail
Plaintiff:
James Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
See v. Lingo et al
as 6:2019cv06124
Defendant:
Malvern Police Department, Clay Coke, Hot Springs County and others
Plaintiff:
Christpher Lynn See
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
See v. Coke et al
as 4:2019cv00747
Defendant:
Malvern Police Department, Clay Coke, Hot Springs County and others
Plaintiff:
Christpher Lynn See
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman v. Hot Spring County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2019cv00523
Defendant:
Woody, John Does, Hot Spring County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jason Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Heath Dickson
as 6:2019cv06043
Defendant:
Hot Springs County, AR, 153-CPL Heath Dickson and Malvern Police Department
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Hot Springs, City of et al
as 6:2019cv06006
Defendant:
Chief of Police Jason Stachey, Hot Springs, City of, Sheriff Mike Cash and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Dickson et al
as 6:2018cv06124
Defendant:
John Doe, 1-50, The Malvern City Police Department, The Hot Spring County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Daniel Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDALUSIA HEALTH et al v. AZAR, II
as 1:2018cv01756
Plaintiff:
KING'S DAUGHTERS' HOSPITAL & HEALTH SERVICES, CENTEGRA HOSPITAL - WOODSTOCK, BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER - EAST CAMPUS and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
