Cases 21 - 30 of 2,283
Tinch v. Streeval
as 7:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Tekoa Ouatrell Tinch
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moon v. Richison et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Chesley Moon
Defendant:
Chad Richison, Henry C. Duques, Robert J. Levenson and others
Sivak v. Fitzgerald et al
as 3:2023cv06256
Plaintiff:
Lacey Mark Sivak
Defendant:
Lisa Fitzgerald, Bridget S. Bade, Kenneth K. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00771
Petitioner:
Jonathan R. Franklin
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval and D.O.J. (FBOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Dickey v. Hooper et al
as 2:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Douglas Dickey
Defendant:
Sheriff J.C. Hooper and Nueces County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fashion Exchange, LLC v. Hybrid Promotions, LLC
as 23-7818
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FASHION EXCHANGE, LLC
Defendant:
JIMMY JAZZ, INC., FOOT LOCKER, INC., FOREVER 21 RETAIL, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
HYBRID PROMOTIONS, LLC, JARROD DOGAN, GAVIN DOGAN and others
Hamze v. Morgan et al
as 5:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Hamze
Defendant:
FNU Morgan, J.C. Walker, FNU Rathel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamze v. Morgan et al
as 3:2023cv01394
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Hamze
Defendant:
Morgan, J.C. Walker, Rathel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelko v. Stith et al
as 2:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
John Douglas Pelko and John D Pelko
Defendant:
Judge David Stith, Sheriff J.C. Hooper, Nueces County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
