Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Johnson v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45504
Plaintiff:
Jamie Johnson
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanton v. Joyner et al
as 3:2019cv00270
Defendant:
Jamie Johnson, Daron Hall, Kevin Cole and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuler v. Hall et al
as 3:2019cv00266
Defendant:
Tony Wilkes, Ello Ledezma, Ms. Gearl and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis Clay Shuler, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2019cv00082
Plaintiff:
Jamie Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carter v. Harrison County Narcotics Agency et al
as 1:2018cv00372
Defendant:
Harrison County Narcotics Agency, Jamie Johnson, Ryan Herns and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bunch v. Sargent et al
as 3:2018cv00760
Defendant:
Corporal Clark Sargent, Kevin Cole, Jamie Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bunch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prettyman v. Conrad et al
as 3:2018cv00299
Plaintiff:
Brendon J. Prettyman
Defendant:
Thomas Conrad, Emilio Segarra, Sean Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Social Security
as 2:2017cv13126
Plaintiff:
Richard Jamie Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kilburn v. Distribution Solutions, LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00861
Defendant:
Jim Bizzieri, Distribution Solutions, LLC, J3 Oil and Gas, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Caz Kilburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal - ERISA
Johnson v. Pamplin et al
as 3:2017cv00560
Plaintiff:
Jami Johnson
Defendant:
D. Pamplin, G. Valdovinas, A. Massia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
