Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Ferguson v. The Judicial System of the Hall of Justice
as 3:2013cv00270
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Rodgers Ferguson
Defendant:
The Judicial System of the Hall of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodgers v. United Air Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00218
Plaintiff:
James Timothy Rodgers
Defendant:
United Air Lines, Inc. and City and County of Denver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ferguson v. Clark et al
as 3:2013cv00069
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Rodgers Ferguson
Defendant:
Christopher Clark and Louisville Metro of Correction Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodgers v. Mattingly Foods, Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00713
Plaintiff:
James R Rodgers
Defendant:
Mattingly Foods, Inc , Andrew Hess , Benjamin Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
RODGERS v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2012cv03472
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEON RODGERS
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY and JOHN DOE(S) 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ferguson v. Metro Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv00336
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Rodgers Ferguson
Defendant:
Metro Corrections, Public Defender Advocacy, Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Louisville Metro Corrections
as 3:2011cv00721
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Rodgers Ferguson
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Rodgers et al
as 2:2011mc03585
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Earl Rodgers
Garnishee:
Sanders Lead Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
RODGERS v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv38536
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. RODGERS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Rodgers v. Pierce
as 2:2011cv02114
Petitioner:
James E Rodgers
Respondent:
Guy Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
