Cases 21 - 30 of 57,508
Doe v. DTE Energy
as 2:2025cv10429
Petitioner:
Jane Doe
Respondent:
DTE Energy
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Wingate v. Samad et al
as 9:2025cv00207
Plaintiff:
Shakur Wingate
Defendant:
Dr. Imtiaz Samad, Dr. Subbarao Ramineni, M. Esposito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE EB 67 v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2025cv01458
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE EB 67
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DOE EB 68 v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2025cv01466
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE EB 68
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CARLAN v. ASHFORD et al
as 5:2025cv00053
Plaintiff:
JAMES THOMAS CARLAN
Defendant:
JUDGE JASON ASHFORD, OFFICER TRAVIS EMMERT and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawaii Carpenters Trust Funds et al v. Romsco, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv00065
Plaintiff:
Hawaii Carpenters Trust Funds, Health and Welfare Fund, Apprenticeship & Training Fund and others
Defendant:
Romsco, Inc., John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Doe v. Coppotelli
as 3:2025cv00204
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Guselli Coppotelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mustafa v. John/Jane Doe et al
as 3:2025cv03039
Plaintiff:
Abeer Mustafa
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe and Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
THOMAS v. KUWAIT AIRWAYS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2025cv01211
Plaintiff:
THOMAS V THOMAS
Defendant:
KUWAIT AIRWAYS CORPORATION, JOHN DOE I-X, JANE DOE I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
