Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Bartholomew v. Rehil et al
as 9:2020cv01342
Defendant:
Brian Rehil, Jefferson County Jail, F.B.I. and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Matthew Bartholomew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv07559
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bellamy et al v. Paukowits et al
as 3:2020cv00752
Plaintiff:
Florence Bellamy and Michael J. Bellamy
Defendant:
EAN Holdings, LLC, Jason Matthew Paukowits and USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00733
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Jason Gatewood
as 20-5812
Defendant / Appellant:
JASON M. GATEWOOD, aka Jason Matthew Gatewood
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
LEBISCHAK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv63721
Plaintiff:
JASON MATTHEW LEBISCHAK
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEHL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv53283
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON MATTHEW NEHL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00390
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WALTERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv86429
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON MATTHEW WALTERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jason Truver v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 20-10398
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASON MATTHEW TRUVER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
