Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Koon v. Lynch et al
as 4:2015cv02107
Plaintiff:
Robert Holland Koon
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Jean Toal and Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Tandy Carter
as 14-2258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA JEAN BURNS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery, SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery, GINGLIAT, BETTIS AND SAVITZ LAW FIRM, THE, in its corporate capacity, for damages and for qui tam recovery and others
ASSA'AD-FALTAS v. CARTER et al
as 1:2014cv00678
Plaintiff:
MARIE-THERESE H. ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD
Defendant:
TANDY CARTER, BARBARA JEAN BURNS, SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koon v. McBee et al
as 2:2014cv02663
Plaintiff:
Robert Holland Koon
Defendant:
Brandy Walker McBee, J Mark Hayes, Desiree Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Jean Toal
as 13-1524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH
Defendant - Appellee:
JEAN TOAL, as administratice head of all SC's state courts and all their subordinates who intend to injure Plaintiff, all solely officially and solely for injunctive relief, DANIEL EDWARD SHEAROUSE, as Clerk of SC's Supreme Court and all their subordinates who intend to injure Plaintiff, all solely officially and solely for injunctive relief, MARK KEEL, as Chief of SC's State Law Enforcement Division (SLED) and all their subordinates who intend to injure Plaintiff, all solely officially and solely for injunctive relief and others
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Jean Toal
as 13-1489
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH
Defendant - Appellee:
JEAN TOAL, as administratice head of all SC's state courts and all their subordinates who intend to injure Plaintiff, all solely officially and solely for injunctive relief, DANIEL EDWARD SHEAROUSE, as Clerk of SC's Supreme Court and all their subordinates who intend to injure Plaintiff, all solely officially and solely for injunctive relief, MARK KEEL, as Chief of SC's State Law Enforcement Division (SLED) and all their subordinates who intend to injure Plaintiff, all solely officially and solely for injunctive relief and others
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. South Carolina, State of
as 13-1034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD MPH for herself and qui tam and Ex Rel the Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt (Egypt) and as founder and first member of Doctors Against Drunk Drivers (DADD); Orthodox Christians Against Executions (OCAE); Sojourners
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, all solely officially and solely for injunctive and qui tam relief, NIMRATA HALEY, as SC's Governor; all solely officially and solely for injunctive and qui tam relief, ALAN WILSON, as SC's Attorney General; all solely officially and solely for injunctive and qui tam relief and others
Rochester v. Wilson et al
as 6:2012cv03151
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
A Wilson, State of South Carolina, Jean Toal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Jean Toal
as 12-2326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH
Defendant - Appellee:
JEAN TOAL, as administratice head of all SC's state courts and all their subordinates who intend to injure Plaintiff, all solely officially and solely for injunctive relief, DANIEL EDWARD SHEAROUSE, as Clerk of SC's Supreme Court and all their subordinates who intend to injure Plaintiff, all solely officially and solely for injunctive relief, MARK KEEL, as Chief of SC's State Law Enforcement Division (SLED) and all their subordinates who intend to injure Plaintiff, all solely officially and solely for injunctive relief and others
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Toal et al
as 3:2012cv02991
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas
Defendant:
Jean Toal, Daniel Shearouse, Mark Keel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
