Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Jones v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2008cv00241
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wade Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Goss v. Quarterman
as 08-10598
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY WADE GOSS
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Goss v. Quarterman
as 3:2008cv00174
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Wade Goss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burt et al v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
as 0:2007cv03425
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Burt, Jacqueline Burt, Jacqueline Burt and others
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wade v. True
as 5:2007cv00666
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wade
Defendant:
John H True
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Burt et al v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc
as 2:2007cv00630
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Burt, Ingrid C Reeves, Jeffrey Wade Fox and others
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc, C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc, C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Patterson v. Powers
as 3:2007cv01580
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Wade Patterson
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Powers
as 3:2007cv01579
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Wade Patterson
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. State of California
as 3:2007cv01104
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Wade Patterson
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
