Cases 21 - 30 of 189
Collins v. MidFirst Bank
as 4:2023cv02561
Plaintiff:
John Collins
Defendant:
MidFirst Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Whyte v. Collins
as 3:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
Deandre Whyte
Defendant:
John Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Straub v. LivePerson, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03078
Plaintiff:
Michael Straub
Defendant:
LivePerson, Inc., Rob LoCascio and John Collins
Collins v. Pearson Education, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02219
Plaintiff:
John Collins
Defendant:
Pearson Education, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 271
McCall v. New Life Interfaith Ministries Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Kenyon J McCall
Defendant:
New Life Interfaith Ministries Inc, George Matthews, II, Michael B. Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 3:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
John W Collins and John Collins
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sims v. McDuffie et al
as 3:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Shawn Andrea Roberson Sims and United States Department of Justice
Defendant:
Mary McDuffie, John Collins and Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Braithwaite v. Suffolk County New York et al
as 2:2022cv05073
Plaintiff:
Keston Braithwaite
Defendant:
Suffolk County New York, New York State, Raymond Teirney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1573
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Castaneda v. Great Bend Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv03139
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ray Castaneda
Defendant:
Great Bend Police Department, Barton County Sheriff's Department, Shane Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
