Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv09839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Divane et al v. Revcon Technology Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv08037
Plaintiff:
William T. Divane, Jr. , Terry Allen , Kenneth J. Bauwens and others
Defendant:
Revcon Technology Group, Inc. and S & P Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1381
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv23127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lucia Oporto, et al v. City of El Paso, Texas, et al
as 11-50060
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LUCIA ESMERALDA OPORTO, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate John Dalton Martinez, and on behalf of all of the heirs at law, ANGEL JOSE MARTINEZ, Individually and ELIJAH ISAIAH MARTINEZ, Individually
Defendant - Appellant:
RODOLFO MORENO, Officer, Badge Number 2646, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer of the City of El Paso Police Department and EDWIN MAYORGA, Officer, Badge Number 2472, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer of the City of El Paso Police Department; Jointly and Severally
Bowhall v. Department of Defense et al
as 2:2010cv00607
Plaintiff:
William E. Bowhall
Defendant:
Department of Defense, US Airforce, US Army and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Dalton
as 3:2009cv05423
Plaintiff:
John Dalton
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dalton v. USA
as 3:2009cv03151
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Dalton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dalton et al v. Animas Corporation
as 3:2009cv00354
Plaintiff:
Ronna Dalton, Ronna Dalton, Ronna Dalton and others
Defendant:
Animas Corporation and Animas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
