Cases 21 - 30 of 1,295
Taylor v. Blount County Jail
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
James K. Taylor
Defendant:
Blount County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Janous v. Aramark Corporation
as 3:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Frank Donald Janous
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation a/k/a Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Corporation and Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smith v. K-Trans Management, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Tameka Emory Smith
Defendant:
K-Trans Management, Inc. and Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1164
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Whyte v. Bell et al
as 3:2023cv01321
Plaintiff:
Darrell Ricardo Whyte
Defendant:
Brenna K. Bell, Jennings H, Jones, Donna Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clinton v. Harrison
as 2:2023cv02754
Petitioner:
Gregory K. Clinton
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Watkins v. Obion County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01260
Plaintiff:
Bryan K Watkins
Defendant:
Obion County Jail and Jennifer Shirley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Boykins et al
as 2:2023cv02803
Plaintiff:
Justin T. Johnson
Defendant:
K. Boykins, Off. Bailey, D.R.T. Off. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
