Cases 21 - 30 of 50
GAYNOR v. HOLLIBAUGH et al
as 2:2023cv03562
Petitioner:
COREY GAYNOR
Respondent:
KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bernard Jerry-ElIn re: Bernard Jerry-El
as 21-2553
Petitioner:
In re: BERNARD CARTER JERRY-EL
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MELISSA HAINSWORTH, KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH and others
Respondent:
KEITH A. PESTO
Robert Fennell v. Francis Pirozzola, et al
as 19-3304
Defendant:
GARY BLAKELY, FRANCIS PIROZZOLA, KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT FENNELL
FENNELL v. PIROZZOLA et al
as 3:2019cv00097
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FENNELL
Defendant:
DAVID CLOSE, KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH, LONNIE OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Wayne Prater v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor
as 19-1732
Defendant / Appellee:
ELIZABETH JURY, Nurse at SCI Houtzdale, RICHARD, MAINES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE PRATER
BULLARD et al v. SMEAL et al
as 2:2019cv01186
Defendant:
SHELIA MOORE SMEAL, DAVID CLOSE, KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES FOY BULLARD and ABDUL IDEEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATER v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2019cv00019
Defendant:
PEGGY BARNS, DAVID CLOSE, REBECCA REIFER and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PRATER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2017cv01520
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donna Hill v. James Barnacle, et al
as 17-2448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA M. HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BARNACLE, STEVEN GLUNT, DAVID CLOSE and others
In re: Donna Hill
as 17-1481
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: DONNA M. HILL
Defendant - Respondent:
JAMES BARNACLE, STEVEN GLUNT, DAVID CLOSE and others
Nominal Respondent:
NORA B. FISCHER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
