Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Kakadelas v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv01451
Plaintiff:
Kyle Thomas Kakadelas
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id
Brigman v. Schaum et al
as 1:2021cv01302
Plaintiff:
Lloyd James Brigman
Defendant:
Adam Schaum, Hellam Township Police Department, Pennsylvania State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv28656
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KYLE THOMAS PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aursby v. Richardson et al
as 7:2021cv00339
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Gregory Brian Saathoff, Kyle Thomas Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
James R. Aursby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Gonzalez v. Department (Bureau) of Real Es, et al
as 21-15696
Defendant / Appellee:
WAYNE S. BELL, WILLIAM E. MORAN, JEFF DAVI and others
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, as successor by merger to Chase Home Finance, LLC, HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., HARDY, Senior Deputy and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL GONZALEZ
(PC)Facchin v. Kelley
as 1:2021cv00289
Plaintiff:
Kyle Thomas Facchin
Defendant:
Sean Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Dugger
as 21-40048
Defendant / Appellant:
Kyle Thomas Dugger
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Brigman v. Schaum et al
as 1:2020cv01549
Defendant:
Adam Schaum, Constable Shannon, Robert A. Eckenrode and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd James Brigman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv77066
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KYLE THOMAS FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATHENY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv75636
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KYLE THOMAS MATHENY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
