Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Robert Polk v. Fayette County Detention Cente, et al
as 12-5232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. POLK
Defendant - Appellee:
FAYETTE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS MEDICAL SERVICE, et al
Yearby v. Levasseur et al
as 3:2011cv01269
Plaintiff:
Toric Lavern Yearby
Defendant:
Jon M. Levasseur, M. Kennedy, Garrett L. Heishman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirk Williams v. State of California, et al
as 11-17747
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRK DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY, LASSEN COUNTY and others
Gabriel Cortez v. Matthew Cates, et al
as 11-17507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GABRIEL RUDY CORTEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW L. CATES, Esquire, RICHARD J. KIRKLAND, ROBERT A. HOREL, Warden and others
Lofofora Eva Contreraz v. Sharon et al
as 1:2011cv01607
Plaintiff:
Lofofora Eva Contreraz
Defendant:
Jared Sharon and L. Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 3:2011cv00913
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lavocia Ward
Defendant:
Secretary, DOC, Randall L. Polk, G. A. Espino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Produce Distribution Center, LLC v. Davis Produce & Plants, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00078
Plaintiff:
Produce Distribution Center, LLC
Defendant:
Davis Produce & Plants, Inc. , Sherry L. Polk and Randall E. Davis
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Hickey et al v. Gusman et al
as 2:2010cv04410
Plaintiff:
Micheal Hickey and Adam Hickey
Defendant:
Marlin Gusman, Samuel Gore, Mary Anne Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of California et al
as 2:2010cv02893
Plaintiff:
Kirk Douglas Williams
Defendant:
State of California, Sacramento County, Lassen County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
