Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Trussell et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics
as LAW/3:13-cv-02668
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Plaintiff:
David W Trussell and Lisa W Trussell
Bennett et al v. Vogan et al
as 1:2013cv00832
Plaintiff:
Lisa W. Bennett and Edward J. Bennett
Defendant:
Kelly P. Vogan and Vogan Associates Design Build, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wells v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
Lisa W Wells
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Babson et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 7:2013cv00033
Plaintiff:
Lisa W. Babson and Joseph H. Babson
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP , Bank of America Corporation and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Donnawell v. Hamburger et al
as 1:2012cv09074
Plaintiff:
Jan Donnawell
Defendant:
Daniel Hamburger, Christopher B Begley, David S Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Sauls v. Astrue
as 2:2011cv04346
Plaintiff:
Lisa W. Sauls
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Matthews v. Rynd et al
as 4:2011cv02706
Plaintiff:
Sean Matthews
Defendant:
John T Rynd , James W Noe , Stephen M Butz and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Raul v. Rynd et al
as 1:2011cv00560
Plaintiff:
Pinchus E. Raul
Defendant:
John T. Rynd , James W. Noe , Stephen M. Butz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Frederick Banks v. Sager, et al
as 11-2153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SAGER, Ft. Dix, R & D Officer, R&D DEPT, FORT DIX FCI and others
Ronald Bricker v. Atty Gen PA, et al
as 10-4433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. BRICKER
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTY GEN PA, PATRICK S. CAWLEY, Deputy Att. Gen. of Pa., MARY L. FRIEDLINE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
