Cases 21 - 30 of 129
Dixon v. Marouf et al
as 6:2021cv00380
Defendant:
FIRAS MAROUF, ORLANDO DENTAL CENTER, P.A. and Dr. Firas Marouf
Plaintiff:
Gina M Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dixon v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00016
Plaintiff:
Angela M. Dixon
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Balli v Prime Insurance Company et al
as 2:2020cv02519
Defendant:
Prime Insurance Company, Dorothy M. Dixon and Reginald Owens individually and doing business as Tic Tac Trucking, LLC
Plaintiff:
Johnny A Balli, Jr individually and doing business as Balli Plumbing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIXON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv89193
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIANA M DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIXON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv78955
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JULIE M DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. Davis
as 6:2020cv00405
Defendant:
TDCJ Director Lorie Davis
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quicken Loans Inc. v. Mason Dixon Contracting, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00089
Plaintiff:
Quicken Loans Inc.
Defendant:
Andrew M. Dixon and Mason Dixon Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIXON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv16637
Plaintiff:
DONA M DIXON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIXON v. LEWIS et al
as 6:2020cv00016
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL M DIXON, III
Defendant:
TERESA STONE, Ms. Prince, Captain Kenny Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIXON v. LEWIS et al
as 5:2019cv00479
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL M DIXON, III
Defendant:
KENNY THOMPSON, TERESA STONE, LIEUTENANT PRINCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
