Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Ryan Henry, et al v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 11-2125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN C. HENRY, KEVIN ANSARI, JEFFREY BADE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
QUICKEN LOANS INCORPORATED
Kirk Loney v. Mark Sim
as 12-6568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRK L. LONEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK SIMS, Officer, Richmond Police Department, sued in both official and individual capacity, UNKNOWN # 1, Officers, Fed. State and City, DREW, Captain, Richmond Police Department, sued in both official and individual capacity and others
Defendant:
DOUGLAS L. WILDER, Mayor, sued in both official and individual capacity, RODNEY MONROE, Ex-Richmond Police Chief, sued in both official and individual capacity, M. A. HARRISON, Officer, Badge #1925, Richmond Police Department, sued in both official and individual capacity and others
Ryan Henry, et al v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 11-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYAN C. HENRY, KEVIN ANSARI, JEFFREY BADE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
QUICKEN LOANS, INCORPORATED
Kirk Loney v. Douglas Wilder
as 10-7317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRK L. LONEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS L. WILDER, Mayor, sued in both official and individual capacity, RODNEY MONROE, Ex-Richmond Police Chief, sued in both official and individual capacity, MARK SIMS, Officer, Richmond Police Department, sued in both official and individual capacity and others
Loney v. Wilder et al
as 3:2008cv00820
Plaintiff:
Kirk Lee Loney
Defendant:
Douglas L. Wilder, Rodney Monroe, Mark Sims and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nunn v. Langely et al
as 3:2008cv00035
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Nunn, Sr.
Defendant:
Terry Langely and Mark Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunn v. Langely et al
as 4:2008cv00036
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Nunn, Sr.
Defendant:
Terry Langely and Mark Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NUNN v. LANGELY et al
as 4:2008cv00022
Plaintiff:
TYRONE NUNN, SR
Defendant:
TERRY LANGELY and MARK SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
