Cases 21 - 30 of 61,870
Speaks v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01768
Plaintiff:
Linda Speaks
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jordan-Harris v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
Nakia Jordan-Harris
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Does et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv04319
Plaintiff:
"John" Does and Jane Does
Defendant:
New York City, Eric Adams, NYPD Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Shawn Myron Jones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carmelo Giuffre v. North American Spine LLC, et al
as 24-2073
Plaintiff:
CARMELO JOHN GIUFFRE
Defendant:
NORTH AMERICAN SPINE LLC, DAMON J. NOTO, MD, SPINE & JOINT CENTER and others
Tillman et al v. Edwards et al
as 2:2024cv01577
Plaintiff:
Charmaine Tillman, Cardarrin Tillman and Joelindiya Collins
Defendant:
Daniel H Edwards, Jerry D Martin, Joe Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kemp v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Mary Kemp
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Murdock v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01786
Plaintiff:
Sasshae Alicia Murdock
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hogue v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hogue
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
LEAL v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
YVONNE LEAL
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
