Cases 21 - 30 of 44
LAKOWITZ v. SQUARE 1 FINANCIAL, INC.
as 1:2015cv00371
Defendant:
SQUARE 1 FINANCIAL, INC., DOUGLAS H. BOWERS, SUSAN G. CASEY and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LAKOWITZ
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
MATHIS v. MILEM et al
as 1:2015cv00215
Plaintiff:
QUENTIN ODELL MATHIS
Defendant:
J. A. MILEM, S. L. HOPKINS and J. L. KEMPF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATHIS v. USA
as 1:2014cv01044
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MARTY KEITH MATHIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Faison, et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00229
Plaintiff:
John Dee Faison , Bernita Faison , Brenda Atkinson and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torchia v. Cherokee County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 2:2014cv00020
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Torchia
Defendant:
Cherokee County Sheriff's Department , Keith Lovin , Tory Lee Shivers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATHIS v. SPRUCE LTC GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00612
Plaintiff:
SHARON MATHIS
Defendant:
SPRUCE LTC GROUP, LLC and PRINCIPLE LONG TERM CARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Coasey et al v. Tatum et al
as 5:2013cv00523
Plaintiff:
Douglas Coasey , David Mathis and Sawand Reynolds
Defendant:
Mable Tatum, Stephen D Johnson, Brandon Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McClure v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
Alma Mathis McClure
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson et al v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2012cv00456
Plaintiff:
Darwin Johnson , Latonja D. Johnson and Brenda J. Mathis
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville , Fayetteville City Police Department , Shane Koehler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MATHIS v. USA
as 1:2012cv00040
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS KENT MATHIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
