Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Walker v. Haley et al
as 3:2014cv00645
Defendant:
M. Chacon, L. Erichson, David Evans and others
Plaintiff:
John Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. SULLIVAN CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv01553
Plaintiff:
INDIANA CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP FUND AND JOURNEYMAN UPGRADE PROGRAM, INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS and others
Defendant:
MEGAN SULLIVAN and SULLIVAN CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Berry v. Sullivan et al
as 2:2012cv15206
Plaintiff:
Duane Berry
Defendant:
Megan Sullivan and John Doe
Veale, et al v. Furness, et al
as 12-1439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID T. VEALE, agent for deceased canine Elsie Veale and SCOTT W. VEALE, agent for deceased canine Elsie Veale
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT T. FURNESS, Dr., DVM, APPLE TREE ANIMAL HOSPITAL, TUFTS UNIVERSITY and others
LAUER et al v. SULLIVAN CONSTRUCTION INC et al
as 1:2012cv00450
Plaintiff:
JOE COAR, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, MICHAEL LAUER and others
Defendant:
MEGAN SULLIVAN and SULLIVAN CONSTRUCTION INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Mutzl et al v. Sullivan Construction Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
Jeff Mutzl , David Tharp , William Nix and others
Defendant:
Sullivan Construction Inc and Megan Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Veale et al v. Furness et al
as 1:2010cv00147
Defendant:
FNU Angel, Angell Animal Medical Center, Animal Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
David T. Veale and Scott W. Veale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
LAUER et al v. SULLIVAN CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00334
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAUER, MICHAEL LAUER, THOMAS FORSEY and others
Defendant:
SULLIVAN CONSTRUCTION, INC. and MEGAN SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
