Cases 21 - 30 of 45
DONNELLY v. KUTZTOWN AREA TRANSPORT SERVICE, INC. et al
as 5:2016cv01128
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DONNELLY
Defendant:
KUTZTOWN AREA TRANSPORT SERVICE, INC. , CLARENCE E. HOWELL and MATTHEW K. ANGSTADT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. DONNELLY
as 2:2015cv05673
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MICHAEL DONNELLY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Donnelly
as 4:2014cv01970
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
D. Michael Donnelly
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Morales v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv02896
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Morales
Defendant:
The City of New York , The New York City Police Department , Michael Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Donnelly et al
as 1:2014cv11400
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jones
Defendant:
Michael Donnelly, Senthil Angamuthu, S3G Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Perez v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv01654
Plaintiff:
Carlos Perez
Defendant:
The City of New York , Michael Donnelly and Thomas Aiello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayers v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv01655
Plaintiff:
Devon Ayers
Defendant:
The City of New York , Michael Donnelly and Thomas Aiello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cosme v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv01653
Plaintiff:
Michael Cosme
Defendant:
The City of New York , Michael Donnelly and Thomas Aiello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Field v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv01378
Plaintiff:
Eric Field
Defendant:
The City of New York , Michael Donnelly, Thomas Aiello and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watkins v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv00887
Plaintiff:
Cathy Watkins
Defendant:
City of New York , Michael Donnelly, Thomas Aiello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
