Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 110
Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd. et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. et al
as 3:2019cv01167
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Maureen Cavanaugh, Eyal Desheh and others
Plaintiff: Psagot Provident Funds & Pension Ltd. and Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Migdal Mutual Funds, Ltd. v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2019cv00923
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Maureen Cavanaugh, Eyal Desheh and others
Plaintiff: Migdal Mutual Funds, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Migdal Insurance Company LTD et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries LTD et al
as 3:2019cv00655
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Eyal Desheh, Maureen Cavanaugh and others
Plaintiff: Yozma Pension Fund of Self Employed LTD, Altshuler Shaham Mutual Funds Management LTD., Provident Fund of the Employees of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Clal Insurance Company Ltd., et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., et al
as 3:2019cv00543
Plaintiff: Clal Pension And Provident Ltd., Alumot Mutual Fund Management Company, Menorah Mivtachim Insurance Ltd. and others
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Eyal Desheh, Sigurdur Olafsson and others
Phoenix Insurance Company Ltd., et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., et al
as 3:2019cv00449
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Eyal Desheh, Sigurdur Olafsson and others
Plaintiff: Phoenix Pension Ltd., Excellence Gemel & Hishtalmut Ltd., Excellence Mutual Funds and others
CLAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. et al v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. et al
as 2:2019cv00530
Plaintiff: CLAL PENSION AND PROVIDENT LTD., ALUMOT MUTUAL FUND MANAGEMENT COMPANY, MENORAH MIVTACHIM INSURANCE LTD. and others
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., EYAL DESHEH, SIGURDUR OLAFSSON and others
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FUNDS, on behalf of its series NATIONWIDE GENEVA MID CAP GROWTH FUND and NATIONWIDE S&P 500 INDEX FUND et al v. PERRIGO COMPANY PLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv15382
Plaintiff: NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FUNDS, on behalf of its series NATIONWIDE GENEVA MID CAP GROWTH FUND and NATIONWIDE S&P 500 INDEX FUND and NATIONWIDE VARIABLE INSURANCE TRUST, on behalf of its series NVIT DYNAMIC U.S. GROWTH FUND, NVIT MULTI-MANAGER LARGE CAP VALUE FUND, NVIT S&P 500 INDEX FUND, and TEMPLETON NVIT INTERNATIONAL VALUE FUN
Defendant: JUDY L. BROWN, JOSEPH C. PAPA and PERRIGO COMPANY PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Adsport, Inc. v. Opko Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv08456
Plaintiff: Adsport, Inc. and Amidex Funds
Defendant: Phillip Frost and Opko Health, Inc.
Petitioner: John Kleiss, Provident Fund of the Employees of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Ltd., Erste Asset Management GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. et al v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. et al
as 2:2018cv03305
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., EYAL DESHEH, SIGURDUR OLAFSSON and others
Plaintiff: EXCELLENCE GEMEL & HISHTALMUT LTD., THE PHOENIX PENSION LTD., THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In Re: Petrobras Securities
as 18-2324
Plaintiff: Aura Capital Ltd., Dimensional Emerging Markets Value Fund, DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc., on behalf of its series Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: Peter Kaltman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Union Asset Management Holding AG and Jonathan Messing, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated
Appellant: Pomerantz LLP
Defendant - Appellee: Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras, BB Securities Ltd., Theodore Marshall Helms and others
Defendant: Mariangela Mointeiro Tizatto, Josue Christiano Gome Da Silva, Daniel Lima De Oliveira and others
Appellee: Mathis B. Bishop, Catherine O. Bishop, Joseph Gielata and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?