Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Mangram v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as WVS/2:12-cv-01162
Plaintiff: Zena Elizabeth Mangram
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc.
Mangram v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2012cv01162
Plaintiff: Zena Elizabeth Mangram
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mangram v. Williams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00046
Plaintiff: Matthew Lamont Mangram
Defendant: Amanda Williams and Bruce Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mangram v. Mangram et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00195
Plaintiff: Matthew Mangram
Defendant: Day Quan Mangram, Ladell Ellis, Moonpie Hardey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mangram v. Mangram et al
as 2:2011cv00194
Plaintiff: Matthew Mangram
Defendant: Dan Mangram, Tony Mangram, Oscar Mangram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mangram v. Chatman
as 2:2011cv00134
Petitioner: Matthew Lamont Mangram
Respondent: Bruce Chatman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sampson et al v. Fuller et al
as 2:2011cv00013
Plaintiff: Marietta Sampson , Oscar Mangram , Ernest Fuller , III and others
Defendant: City of Brunswick, Glynn County, Georgia, Shaun T. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Mangram vs Jewelers Mutual Insurance Company
as 4:2010cv01245
Plaintiff: Anthony Mangram
Defendant: Jewelers Mutual Insurance Company
Counter_claimant: Jewelers Mutual Insurance Company
Counter_defendant: Anthony Mangram
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Type: Contract Insurance
Mangram v. Lee We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00207
Petitioner: Matthew L. Mangram
Respondent: Thomas Lee , Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mangram v. Williams
as 2:2009cv00201
Petitioner: Matthew Mangram
Respondent: Amanda Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?