Cases 21 - 30 of 36
MURPHY v. SMITH et al
as 1:2015cv00173
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
JONATHAN SMITH, EARL SAUNDERS, CHARLES HART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guichardo et al v. Hanson et al
as 1:2015cv00585
Defendant:
Tony Abreu, Jon Aceto, Christopher W. Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Carmen C. Guichardo, Elido A. Guichardo, Elijah J. Guichardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MURPHY v. CASAVANT et al
as 1:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
JANE AND JOHN DOE'S, DONALD MARDEN, JOSHUA ROBBINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MURPHY v. CASAVANT et al
as 1:2014cv02165
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
JANE AND JOHN DOE'S, DONALD MARDEN, JOSHUA ROBBINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Brooks v. Russell
as 4:2014cv00061
Petitioner:
Mark Brooks
Respondent:
Terry Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Church of Universal Love, et al v. Fayette County, et al
as 13-3586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHURCH OF UNIVERSAL LOVE AND MUSIC
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KEN WHIPKEY, JACOB GARLETTS and KELLY GARLETTS
Defendant - Appellee:
FAYETTE COUNTY, FAYETTE COUNTY DRUG TASK FORCE, MARK BROOKS and others
Sollars v. Stormont-Vail Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02260
Plaintiff:
Brian Sollars
Defendant:
Stormont-Vail Healthcare, Inc., Mark Brooks and Anne Wempe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Timothy Humphries v. David Chicarelli, et al
as 13-3631
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY W. HUMPHRIES
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID A. CHICARELLI, CITY OF CARLISLE, TIMOTHY BOGGESS and others
Brooke v. American General Life Insurance Company
as 1:2011cv00461
Plaintiff:
Mark Brooke
Defendant:
American General Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. Dade County Jail Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv24295
Plaintiff:
Mark Brooks
Defendant:
Dade County Jail Corrections and Julio Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
