Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Tepe v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
Tepe v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2023cv02568
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
Mawule Tepe v. Clifton Corker
as 23-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIFTON LELAND CORKER, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, in her Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Tepe v. Corker et al
as 3:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Clifton L. Corker, Travis R. McDonough, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Tepe v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 1:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mawule Tepe v. USA, et al
as 23-5593
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CURTIS L. COLLIER, United States District Court Judge, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, United States District Court Judge and others
Tepe v. Truist Financial Corporation
as 1:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Truist Financial Corporation, Clifton L Corker, Jane Doe3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Mawule Tepe v. USA, et al
as 23-5188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CURTIS L. COLLIER, United States District Court Judge, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, United States Magistrate Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
