Cases 21 - 30 of 323
US v. Kevin McClary
as 23-6182
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN WATSON MCCLARY
REGIONS BANK v. GREATER DELIVERANCE CHURCH INC et al
as 5:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
REGIONS BANK
Defendant:
Greater Deliverance Church Inc., SHERLENE MCCLARY a/ka/ Sherlene Bradley McClary, SHERLENE MCCLARY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
(PC) Rojas v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2022cv00968
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Rojas
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, McClary, Khripunov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rojas v. County of Sacramento et al
as 1:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Rojas
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, McClary, Khripunov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLARY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06505
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY MCCLARY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas Fox v. Saginaw County, MI, et al
as 22-1272
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THOMAS A. FOX, and all those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
ALCONA COUNTY, MI, by its Board of Commissioners, CHERYL FRANKS, in her official and individual capacities, WASHTENAW COUNTY, MI and others
Defendant:
SAGINAW COUNTY, MI, et al
MCCLARY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05020
Plaintiff:
VAN MCCLARY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ronald McClary v. Michael Butler
as 22-6204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD MCCLARY
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL BUTLER
Biegon v. City of Dallas
as 22-10075
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Isaac K. Biegon
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Dallas, Dallas Police Department, Edgardo Garcia and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
