Cases 21 - 30 of 110
Jason Ellis v. Hammon, et al
as 21-35312
Defendant / Appellee:
MARCH, C.O. TRCI, HAMMON, C.O. OSP, HOUSTON, Lt. TRCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON MICHAEL ELLIS
Howe, et al. v. Roberts, et al.
as 1:2021cv00175
Defendant:
Bridget Bade, Milan D Smith, Srikanth Srinivason and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellis, Ebenezer K. Howe, IV and Robert McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2607
DAN RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC. v. BOTTOMS UP SCUBA INDY LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00218
Defendant:
CLAYTON ST. JOHN, BOTTOMS UP SCUBA INDY LLC, BOTTOMS UP SCUBA LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAN RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Michael Wiggins
as 20-7840
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL ELLIS WIGGINS, a/k/a Thrax
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TATUM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv92882
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ELLIS TATUM
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. Tradesmen International, LLC
as 3:2020cv01251
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellis
Defendant:
Tradesmen International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELLIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv57388
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELLIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv30800
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELLIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv20595
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
