Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Phillips v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv31020
Plaintiff:
Michelle Phillips
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curley Boykin v. Carrie Hucklebridge, et al
as 14-11350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURLEY JAMES BOYKIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELL PHILLIP, Senior Warden and ROLANDA WINFIELD, Assistant Warden
Curley Boykin v. Carrie Hucklebridge, et al
as 14-10968
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURLEY BOYKIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CARRIE HUCKLEBRIDGE, Manager 3, Correctional Health Care, LANNETTE LINITHICUM, Director Health Service, MICHELL PHILLIP, Senior Warden and others
Phillips v. United States of America
as 5:2014cv00632
Movant:
Jan Michel Phillips
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Phillips
as 5:2014cv00144
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Patricia Michelle Phillips
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Phillips et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02648
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Guy Phillips and Amber Michele Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boykin v. Bridge et al
as 3:2013cv04643
Plaintiff:
Curley James Boykin
Defendant:
Carrie Huckle Bridge, Lannette Linthicum, Michell Phillip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Higgins, II v. Michell Phillip, et al
as 13-11206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES HIGGINS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELL PHILLIP, Warden, Dawson State Jail, ROLANDA WINFIELD, Warden, Dawson State Jail, NFN GOOD, L.V.N. and others
Higgins v. Phillip et al
as 3:2013cv02877
Plaintiff:
Charles Higgins, II
Defendant:
Michell Phillip, Rolanda Winfield, Good NFN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
