Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Vincent Rivera v. Mitch Daniels, et al
as 10-3622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT F. RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCH DANIELS, Governor, STEVE CARTER, Attorney General, TIM BERRY, Treasurer and others
HOWELL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2010cv00981
Defendant:
JESSICA ALLEN, GREGORY BALLARD, CARL BRIZZI and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY E. HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITLOCK v. DANIELS et al
as 1:2010cv00802
Defendant:
EDWIN BUSS, MITCH DANIELS, BRUCE C. LEMMON and others
Plaintiff:
FLOYD E. WHITLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booker-El v. Trotter et al
as 3:2010cv00251
Plaintiff:
Sammie L Booker-El
Defendant:
Delray Trotter, Wayne Peoples, Bill Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muckle v. US, et al
as 10-1652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL L. MUCKLE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, GEORGE W. BUSH, BARACK OBAMA and others
Booker-El v. Wilson et al
as 3:2010cv00222
Petitioner:
Sammie L Booker-El
Defendant:
Bill Wilson, Eddie Buss, Gregory Zoeller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHEUMANN-WHITNEY v. STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2010cv00630
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF I.D.O.C., GOVERNOR MITCH DANIELS, ALL EMPLOYEES and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN CHARLES SCHEUMANN-WHITNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeffrey Smith v. J. Donahue, et al
as 09-2994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY L. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
J. DAVID DONAHUE, LINDA JEFFERS, DAINE MALFESE and others
WOODARD v. MORRISON et al
as 1:2009cv00899
Plaintiff:
CAROL WOODARD
Defendant:
TIMOTHY MORRISON, WINFIELD ONG, MICHAEL WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
