Cases 21 - 29 of 29
RAZ TRADING LLC. v. US DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE et al
as 1:2012cv00944
Plaintiff:
RAZ TRADING LLC.
Defendant:
US DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE, HUNTS POINT CO-OPERATIVE MKT., GEORGE OLIVARES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAZTRADING LLC. v. US DEPT OF AGRICULTURE et al
as 1:2012cv00979
Plaintiff:
RAZTRADING LLC.
Defendant:
US DEPT OF AGRICULTURE, HUNTS POINT MKT. CO-OP., NEXIS LEXIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Konstantinovich v. Smith et al
as 1:2011cv04950
Plaintiff:
Ivan Nicholivich Konstantinovich
Defendant:
Yvonne G. Smith, Iris Jordan, Dept. of Health, Statistics & Vital Records and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv01630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In Re: Katrina Canal
as 08-30362
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHTON R O'DWYER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT, JOHNNY D BRADBERRY, Individually and in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Transportation and Development, State of Louisiana, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
In Re: Katrina Canal, et al
as 07-30349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAUREEN O'DWYER, HAROLD JOSEPH GAGNET, SALLY EGERTON RICHARDS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT, State of Louisiana, STATE OF LOUISIANA, KATHLEEN BLANCO, Governor, Both Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Louisiana and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
