Cases 21 - 30 of 1,014
Bain v. GOE et al
as 5:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Keith Elliott Bain
Defendant:
GOE/ LRCF, Warden Cole, John Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parnell et al v. City of Berkeley
as 3:2023cv06379
Plaintiff:
Lawanda Parnell, Merced Dominguez, Mike Douglas and others
Defendant:
City of Berkeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Parnell, et al
as 3:2023cv01287
Plaintiff:
Michael F Thomas
Defendant:
Anthony G Parnell and Columbia County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Desouze v. Osteen et al
as 4:2023cv04198
Plaintiff:
Neville Ambrose Desouze
Defendant:
Joel Osteen, Victoria Osteen, Sara Jo Parnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. PARNELL et al
as 4:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F THOMAS
Defendant:
ANTHONY G PARNELL and COLUMBIA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarell Terry v. James Dycus, et al
as 23-3415
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jarell Davis Terry
Defendant / Appellee:
James Dycus, Warden, ADC, Emmer Branch, Warden, ADC, Raymond Naylor, Internal Affair Investigator, ADC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv19235
Plaintiff:
PARNELL SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv24613
Plaintiff:
PARNELL C SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
