Cases 21 - 30 of 2,176
Pettis v. Stewart et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Sammie Henry Pettis
Defendant:
Le Tresia Stewart and Robert P. Myers, Jr.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETTIES v. MCCARTHY
as 3:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
RONALD PETTIES
Defendant:
CONNOR MCCARTHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petty, Daniel v. Mayson et al
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rhymes Petty
Defendant:
Sgt. Mayson, C.O. D. Johnson, C.O. Kaczmarek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Majors v. Trout et al
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Dillonger John Majors
Defendant:
Richard Trout, Sophie Machen, Unknown Reavis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pattison v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE H PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, BRIAN SANDOVAL, STEVE SISOLAK and others
Petty, Daniel v. Best Western Hotel et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Petty and Daniel Rhymes Petty
Defendant:
Best Western Hotel and Best Western International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ward
Defendant:
Bill Stange, Latonya Young, Lorene Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettis v. Keefe Commissary Network
as 5:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Sammie Henry Pettis
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuentes v. O'Malley
as 24-1071
Plaintiff:
PETTY FUENTES
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
PETTIES v. CARAVELLA
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
RONALD PETTIES
Defendant:
ERIC S. CARAVELLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
