Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Edwards v. Cofield et al
as 3:2017cv00321
Plaintiff:
Kandace Kay Edwards
Defendant:
David Cofield , Christopher May , Jill Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Puckett et al v. Darden Restaurants Inc
as 2:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Puckett and Robert Puckett
Defendant:
Darden Restaurants Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv01305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Puckett v. Ridgewood Health Services Inc et al
as 6:2015cv01323
Plaintiff:
Debra Puckett
Defendant:
Ridgewood Health Services Inc and Ridgewood Health Care Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Atlaco, LLC et al v. Caterpillar, Inc. et al
as 7:2013cv00689
Plaintiff:
Argonaut Insurance Company and Atlaco, LLC
Defendant:
D & B Puckett Machinery Company and Caterpillar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laborers National Pension Fund v. Cates & Puckett Construction Company Inc
as 3:2012cv02766
Plaintiff:
Laborers National Pension Fund
Defendant:
Cates & Puckett Construction Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Puckett v. Willis et al
as 1:2012cv01798
Plaintiff:
David Cicero Puckett
Defendant:
Jeff Willis, Fred W Thompson, Clay County Sheriff's Department and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Hooteh et al
as 4:2012cv00799
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
J Hooteh, R Hooteh, W Howard and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Puckett v. Calhoun County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2012cv00637
Plaintiff:
David Cicero Puckett
Defendant:
Calhoun County Sheriff's Department
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
