Cases 21 - 30 of 76
v. Sessions et al
as 3:2017cv04700
Defendant:
Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III, Alan R Hanson and United States Department Of Justice, Atrorney General Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
State of California, ex rel. XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California v. Sessions et al
as 3:2017cv04701
Plaintiff:
State of California, ex rel. XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Defendant:
Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III, Alan R Hanson and United States Department Of Justice, Atrorney General Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City and County of San Francisco v. Sessions et al
as 3:2017cv04642
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco
Defendant:
Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III , Alan R Hanson and Department of Justice
Miscellaneou:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Golston v. Hanson
as 2:2017cv00243
Petitioner:
Cornel Golston
Respondent:
R. Hanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mattes v. Jones et al
as 4:2017cv00952
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Mattes
Defendant:
Jessica Jones, Tammy McGEEHA, Vinnie Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia-Muniz v. Hanson
as 2:2017cv00131
Petitioner:
Rolando Andres Garcia-Muniz
Respondent:
R Hanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Antonio Woodson v. John Burnsed, et al
as 17-11355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO DAMARCUS WOODSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN BURNSED, Sergeant, GEORGE R. HANSON, Captain, KEITH A. MUSSELMAN, Lieutenant and others
Woodson v. Burnsed et al
as 3:2017cv00255
Plaintiff:
Antonio Damarcus Woodson
Defendant:
John Burnsed, George R. Hanson, Keith A. Musselman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canas v. Hanson
as 3:2016cv03506
Petitioner:
Jorge Calderon Canas
Respondent:
R Hanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
