Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Julian Hood, Jr. v. Postmaster General
as 17-1400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
POSTMASTER GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Julian Hood, Jr. v. USPS, et al
as 17-1053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, in her individual and professional capacity, MARYL R. ROSEN, USPS Attorney, in her individual and professional capacity and others
Julian Hood, Jr. v. USPS, et al
as 17-1050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MICHIGAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, WESTERN MICHIGAN AREA LOCAL #281 and AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO
Julian Hood, Jr. v. USPS, et al
as 17-1051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MICHIGAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, WESTERN MICHIGAN AREA LOCAL #281 and AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO
Julian Hood, Jr. v. USPS, et al
as 17-1052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, in her individual and professional capacity, MARYL R. ROSEN, USPS Attorney, in her individual and professional capacity and others
Julian Hood, Jr. v. USPS
as 17-1048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Julian Hood, Jr. v. USPS
as 17-1049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Hood v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv10003
Plaintiff:
Scottie R. Hood
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
