Cases 21 - 30 of 211
Stephens et al v. Lin et al
as 3:2021cv01216
Plaintiff:
Randolph Stephens and Wendy Stephens
Defendant:
Hongyu Lin and Lin Trading Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
AFSCME DISTRICT COUNCIL 33, LOCAL 427 et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv01553
Plaintiff:
AFSCME DISTRICT COUNCIL 33, LOCAL 427, KASHIF CAMPBELL, PRESIDENT CHARLES CARRINGTON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JACQUELINE DUNN, MAYOR JAMES KENNEY and others
PHINISEE v. GRAHAM-PARKER et al
as 2:2020cv05279
Plaintiff:
RASHEENA PHINISEE
Defendant:
AVANI SHAH, HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE FAMILY PRACTICE AND COUNSELING NETWORK-THE HEALTH ANNEX and others
Petitioner:
KAI PITTMAN, SUSAN ENGLES, LAURA OPPENHEIM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Fenner v. Lehigh Valley Health Network
as 3:2021cv00075
Defendant:
Lehigh Valley Health Network d/b/a Lehigh Valley Hospital - Pocono
Plaintiff:
Randolph S. Fenner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Randolph v. Turgeon et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Defendant:
Jeannine Turgeon, Carrie Shanahan, Aishah Callaway and others
Plaintiff:
Samira Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERREIRAS v. RICE-GREGO et al
as 2:2020cv01686
Defendant:
CHCA STEPHANIE WOOD, RN CARTER, RN MARK JENKINS and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER FERREIRAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
HARRIS v. QUAY et al
as 2:2020cv04080
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF: MARYLAND and WARDEN QUAY
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH S. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MOORE v. WARDEN - USP ALLENWOOD
as 2:2020cv01334
Respondent:
WARDEN - USP ALLENWOOD
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
