Cases 21 - 30 of 200
Ronald Johnson v. United States
as 22-1701
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ronald David Johnson
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Sutherland v. Ramos et al
as 3:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Ronald David Sutherland
Defendant:
Leslie Ramos, Kim Turner, U Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanwinkle v. Wilkinson
as 4:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Ryan Vanwinkle
Defendant:
Ronald David Wilkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv05611
Plaintiff:
Wham-O Holding, Ltd., Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O and Intersport Corp. doing business as WHAM-O
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 15254171701@163.com, AbnerNelsongLfFu and others
Garnishee:
jose15
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
PEREZ-GUERRA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53850
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVID PEREZ-GUERRA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sutherland v. Shaw
as 21-10919
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Sutherland, also known as Ronald David Sutherland
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU Shaw and Officer Gay
JONES v. GADSDEN COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
as 4:2021cv00377
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVID JONES
Defendant:
GADSDEN COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLINE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46139
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVID CLINE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirkpatrick v. United States of America
as 5:2021hc02175
Petitioner:
Ronald David Kirkpatrick, II
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JONES v. CITY OF QUINCY
as 4:2021cv00331
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVID JONES
Defendant:
CITY OF QUINCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
