Cases 21 - 30 of 228
Kinsman v. Rawson
as 1:2022cv03338
Petitioner:
John Kinsman
Respondent:
Superintendent Boyce Rawson and Boyce Rawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 hc Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Coombes v. Coombes et al
as 2:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Christopher-David Coombes
Defendant:
Carrie Coombes, Henry Rawson, Victoria Minto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
JOHNSON v. RAWSON FOOD SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00345
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
RAWSON FOOD SERVICES, INC. and WENDYS RESTAURANT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Meadows v. Breakie, et al.
as 3:2021cv00455
Plaintiff:
Dupree L. Meadows
Defendant:
E. Breakie, Detective Alan Winstead, Rebecca Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meadows v. Winstead, et al.
as 2:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
Dupree L. Meadows and Police Officer E. Breakie
Defendant:
Detective Alan Winstead, E. Edwards, A. Dowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lombard v. Rawson-Neill Mental Facility
as 2:2021cv01582
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lombard
Defendant:
Rawson-Neill Mental Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Rawson v. Bryan Morrison
as 21-2841
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAWRENCE RAWSON
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. Cornerstone Demolition Corp. et al
as 5:2021cv00945
Defendant:
DOE 1 through DOE 5, inclusive, CORNERSTONE DEMOLITION CORP., a California corporation, JAMES ROBERT RAWSON, an individual and others
Plaintiff:
CONSTRUCTION LABORERS TRUST FUNDS FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE COMPANY, a Delaware limited liability company and Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
