Cases 21 - 30 of 788
Bias et al v. Skillet Catering Service
as 3:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Michael Spencer Bias, Daniel Hinson, Kenneth Peyton and others
Defendant:
Skillet Catering Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacheco v. Wyatt et al
as 5:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Shelby Wyatt, Jonathan Call, FNU Tilley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Kloepfer et al v. Cherokee County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Jason H. Kloepfer and Alison M. Mahler
Defendant:
Cherokee County Sheriff's Department, Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Loveall v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00951
Plaintiff:
Roger Loveall
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Harris et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2023mc00008
Petitioner:
Roger Harris, John Van Buskirk and William Heinzerling
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Harris et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -
as 7:2023cv00914
Petitioner:
Roger Harris, John Van Buskirk and William Heinzerling
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JOYCE v. USDC JUDGES BETTY PUGH
as 1:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
USDC JUDGES BETTY PUGH, ANGELA MOORE, HENRY ROGERS, JR-SR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
