Cases 21 - 30 of 2,052
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. Rosales
as 24-1382
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JORGE LUIS ROSALES
Martinez de Rosales, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1379
Petitioner:
MARIA ESMERALDA MARTINEZ DE ROSALES, ISIDRO LEONEL ROSALES QUIJANO, BRYAN STEVEN ROSALES MARTINEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Rosales-Ramirez
as 24-50125
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Victor Ines Rosales-Ramirez
Hendershot et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
Albert E Hendershot, Gerald Alameda, Lindell Algiere and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Shaun A. Jones v. C.O. Moisa et al
as 2:2024cv01819
Plaintiff:
Shaun A. Jones
Defendant:
C.O. Moisa, Sgt. John Doe One, John Doe One and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kelly v. Rosales, et al.
as 24-827
Plaintiff:
SHANNON KELLY
Defendant:
M. ROSALES, Correctional Lieutenant, official capacity, J. CODY, Correctional Sergeant, official capacity and J. MARTINEZ, Correctional Officer, official capacity
Hendershot et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Albert E Hendershot, Gerald Alameda, Lindell Algiere and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
