Cases 21 - 30 of 196
Stephen Moretto v. Securus Technologies, et al
as 23-14133
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN MORETTO
Respondent:
SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, JPAY, STALNAKER and others
Olivarez, Jr. et al v. Securus Technologies, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv04271
Plaintiff:
Edwin Olivarez, Jr. and Rogelio Regalado
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, LLC, JPAY LLC,, ALLPAID, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bertolo (PS) v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv02763
Defendant:
Sean Burrows, Dean Williams, Andre Moses Stancil and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Bertolo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moretto v. Securus Technologies et al
as 2:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Stephen Moretto
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, J Pay, N. Stalnaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luevano v. Miller
as 23-50729
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jaime Luevano
Respondent / Appellee:
Gene Miller, Warden, Hughes Unit, Antonio Guterres, United Nations Director, Nikki H, U.S. Ambassador and others
Rogers v. Mestrin et al
as 3:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
David P Rogers
Defendant:
Mike Mestrin, Ricky Ronald, Greg McDonald and others
Securus Technologies, LLC v. McGuinn et al
as 4:2023cv00762
Plaintiff:
Securus Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Daniel McGuinn and Smart Communications Holding, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dell v. Chambers Smith et al
as 2:2023cv03167
Plaintiff:
David Dell
Defendant:
Annette Chambers Smith, GTL/ViaPath and JPay/Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beal v. Securus Technologies Inc
as 4:2023cv05128
Plaintiff:
Nathan O Beal
Defendant:
Securus Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luevano v. Guterres et al
as 6:2023cv00677
Petitioner:
Jamie Luevano
Respondent:
Antonio Guterres, Nikki H., Securus Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
