Cases 21 - 30 of 18,905
Gonzalez-Perez v. Garland
as 24-1566
Petitioner:
NELSON GONZALEZ-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Huang v. Garland
as 24-1564
Petitioner:
GUO-CHENG HUANG
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jing v. Garland
as 24-9540
Petitioner:
SHUANGFA JING
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Anderson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Xavier Dorrell Anderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carreno v. Garland
as 24-1580
Petitioner:
ANGEL ALFREDO CARRENO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Huang v. Garland
as 24-1560
Petitioner:
XIN EN HUANG
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez-Barahona v. Garland
as 24-1559
Petitioner:
KARINA LISETTE MARTINEZ-BARAHONA and BRIANA LISETTE PEREZ-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Safehouse, et al
as 24-2027
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SAFEHOUSE, A Pennsylvania Nonprofit Corporation and JOSE BENITEZ, as President and Treasurer of Safehouse
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Altepeter v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 3:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Sarah Rae Altepeter
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of, Cass County Sheriff's Office, Cass County State's Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Calle v. Garland
as 24-1565
Petitioner:
HUMBERTO ISIDORO CALLE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
