Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Badger v. Roberts et al
as 2:2019cv00653
Defendant:
Chapel Religious Department, Food Services and Superintendent Roberts
Plaintiff:
Fred L. Badger
Consolidated Defendant:
South Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGuirk v. Roberts
as 2:2019cv00677
Plaintiff:
Terrence Joseph McGuirk
Defendant:
Superintendent Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MADDOX v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2019cv01163
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT ROBERT GILMORE, C.O. GUMBERT, C.O. SAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
OMAR MADDOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bracero v. Cunningham et al
as 7:2019cv08285
Defendant:
Sargent D. Curtin, Correction Officer Rodriguez Christopher, Corrections Officer Stuetzle Anthony and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Bracero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valverde v. Folks et al
as 1:2019cv08080
Defendant:
RN Jean Frangella, Superintendent Robert Morton, Sergeant John Gonzalez and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Valverde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Badger v. South Central Regional Jail et al
as 2:2019cv00623
Defendant:
Chapel Religious Department, South Central Regional Jail, Food Services and others
Plaintiff:
Fred L. Badger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGuirk v. Roberts
as 2:2019cv00625
Plaintiff:
Terrence Joseph McGuirk
Defendant:
Superintendent Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robert Washington v. Murphy, et al
as 19-2934
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Defendant:
TRACY SHAWLEY, Grievance Coordinator, MURPHY, Correctional Officer, KERI MOORE, Chief Grievance Officer and others
WAKEFIELD v. GILMORE
as 2:2019cv00983
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT GILMORE
Petitioner:
DALE MICHAEL WAKEFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HARRIS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00479
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT GILMORE, STEPHAN LONGSTRETH and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS BEAU HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
