Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 395
Ruby Hicks v. Doris Scott, et al
as 23-3440
Plaintiff / Appellee: RUBY HICKS, as Administrator of the Estate on behalf of Quandavier K. Hicks
Defendant / Appellant: DORIS A. SCOTT, individually and in her official capacity as employee of the City of Cincinnati, Ohio, JUSTIN T. MOORE, individually and in his official capacity as employee of the City of Cincinnati, Ohio, BENJAMIN M. SCHNEIDER, individually and in his official capacity as employee of the City of Cincinnati, Ohio and others
Maschhoff v. Polished.com Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06606
Plaintiff: Ryan Maschhoff
Defendant: Polished.com Inc., Douglas T. Moore, Robert D. Barry and others
Petitioner: Anthony Porraro, Eden Alpha CI LP and Ari Gold
CASSIDY et al v. Tri-City Electric Co., INC.
as 0:2023cv60895
Plaintiff: ZACHARY T. CASSIDY, JAMES F. STUBBLEFIELD, JUSTIN S. McINTOSH and others
Defendant: Tri-City Electric Co., INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Moore v. Flores et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv02065
Plaintiff: Ryan T. Moore
Defendant: Flores, Demus, Bloomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wong v. Moore et al
as 1:2023cv00559
Plaintiff: Mei Ling Wong
Defendant: Douglas T. Moore, Robert Barry, Albert Fouerti and others
Todd McElroy v. R. Baker, et al
as 23-11805
Plaintiff / Appellant: TODD MCELROY
Defendant / Appellee: R. STAN BAKER, CHRISTOPHER L. RAY and WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR.
Ruby Hicks v. Doris Scott, et al
as 23-3383
Plaintiff / Appellee: RUBY HICKS, as Administrator of the Estate on behalf of Quandavier K. Hicks
Defendant / Appellant: DORIS A. SCOTT, individually and in her official capacity as employee of the City of Cincinnati, Ohio, JUSTIN T. MOORE, individually and in his official capacity as employee of the City of Cincinnati, Ohio, BENJAMIN M. SCHNEIDER, individually and in his official capacity as employee of the City of Cincinnati, Ohio and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00697
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Richemont International SA et al v. The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations
as 0:2023cv60340
Plaintiff: Richemont International SA, Cartier International A.G., Lange Uhren GMBH and others
Defendant: The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations, aabbyee, am ang heng wei and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
McElroy v. Baker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00038
Plaintiff: Todd McElroy
Defendant: US District Judge R. Stan Baker, US Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray and Sr US District Judge William T. Moore, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?