Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Randy Hammermeister v. Cal Ludeman, et al
as 19-1970
Defendant / Appellee:
David Bornus, Emily Johnson Piper, Katherine McDowell and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Randy Earl Hammermeister
Peter Allan, Sr. v. Cal Ludeman, et al
as 19-1987
Defendant / Appellee:
David Bornus, Emily Johnson Piper, Jerry Fjerkenstad and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Peter Allan, Sr.
Kevin Karsjens v. Cal Ludeman, et al
as 19-1992
Defendant / Appellee:
David Bornus, Emily Johnson Piper, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Scott Karsjens
Greene v. Osborne-Leivian et al
as 0:2019cv00533
Defendant:
Crystal Leal, Laurie Severson, Randy Gordon and others
Plaintiff:
Guy I. Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daywitt et al v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2017cv05574
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Steven Daywitt and Kenneth Gernard Parks
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Sara Kulas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allan v. Piper et al
as 0:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Peter Allan, Sr
Defendant:
Emily Johnson Piper, David Herman, Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daywitt et al v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2016cv00648
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Steven Daywitt and Kenneth Gernard Parks
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services , Minnesota Sex Offender Program , Sara Kulas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doranti v. Moser et al
as 0:2015cv03119
Plaintiff:
Sarprio Doranti
Defendant:
Kevin Moser, Terry Kneisel, Brian Ninneman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karsjens v. McCauley et al
as 0:2015cv02590
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scott Karsjens
Defendant:
Meg McCauley, Jana Brister Korby, Dana Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
