Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Graham v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit et al
as 3:2014cv04401
Defendant:
Dallas Area Rapid Transit , Jeanne Jones and Fernando Ibarra, Jr
Plaintiff:
Terry Graham, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry-Graham v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al et al
as 1:2014cv00318
Plaintiff:
LaDon Terry-Graham
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association et al , Timothy J. Mayopoulos and Suntrust Mortgage Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. City Of North Las Vegas et al
as 2:2013cv01815
Defendant:
City of Las Vegas, City of North Las Vegas, Terry Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Shimeka Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Pharr Entertainment Complex, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00427
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Pharr Entertainment Complex, LLC, Terry Graham and Herbert Graham
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0521
Abel v. Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd. et al
as 2:2011cv00080
Plaintiff:
Loreen Tupper, Charles Hartley, Peter Maggiore and others
Defendant:
Devon International Industries, Rosen Materials, LLC, Streamline Homes, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Taylor Morrison Services, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Stock Building Supply, LLC, Banner Supply Company Fort Myers, LLC, South Florida Custom Trim, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Preservation Alliance of New Orleans Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Graham v. USA
as 6:2007cv01256
Plaintiff:
Terry Graham
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
