Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 115
National Railroad Passenger Co, et al v. Julie Su
as 21-15816
Intervenor Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS and others
Defendant / Appellant: JULIE A. SU, in her official capacity as Labor Commissioner, State of California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement
Plaintiff / Appellee: TTX COMPANY, CENTRAL CALIFORNIA TRACTION COMPANY, LOS ANGELES JUNCTION RAILWAY and others
American Train Dispatchers As, et al v. National Railway Labor Confer, et al
as 21-7029
Plaintiff / Appellant: Transportation Communications Union - IAM, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT, Transport Workers Union and others
Defendant / Appellee: Norfolk Southern Railway Company, BNSF Railway Company, Kansas City Southern Railway Company and others
Transportation Division of the, et al v. FRA, et al
as 21-1049
Respondent: United States Department of Transportation and Federal Railroad Administration
Petitioner: Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen and Transportation Division of the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers
Meyers v. Port Authority of Trans Hudson (PATH) et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv09645
Plaintiff: Rachel Meyers
Defendant: Arthur Blakey, Carlos Proano, The Brotherhood of Locomotives, Engineers, and Trainmen (BLET) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Franke et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv02152
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment, David Ray and others
Plaintiff: Jeff Franke, Steven Frye and Greg Fish
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
AMERICAN TRAIN DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION et al v. NATIONAL RAILWAY LABOR CONFERENCE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02139
Defendant: The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERS, AFL-CIO ("IAM"), TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION, BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen et al
as 8:2020cv00247
Defendant: Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen/Union Pacific Central Region General Committee of Adjustment and BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN/UNION PACIFIC SOUTHERN REGION GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
Plaintiff: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01717
Petitioner: Illinois Central Railroad
Respondent: Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen,
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0152
John James, et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Comp, et al
as 20-3281
Defendant / Appellee: BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN NORFOLK SOUTHERN NORTHERN LINES/CF&E GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT, originally named as Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment, DAVID N. RAY, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, Independently, or as part of controlling or parent entity or agent/and International Brotherhood of Teamsters and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN A. JAMES, CHRISTOPHER KOPF and AARON TIFFANY
Franke v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 3:2020cv00478
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment, David Ray and others
Plaintiff: Jeff E. Franke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Labor Labor: Other

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?